First, happy new year!
Second, thanks for your reply!

About the IE6 issue:
It looks like it’s a problem of the domready call i used. With this code the stats seem to be better, but not completely accurate yet. But IE6 support is a mess anyways.
jQuery.noConflict();
(function($){
function callOnDomReady() {
… init tracker…
}
}

Question about licensing:
I can’t find any information about licensing of your file.
Is it free to use for anybody? (Same licensing as jQuery?)

Best regards,
Christian

In answer to your questions…

No, it’s not the latest version. I updated it in February 2009 and renamed it to qGoogleAnalytics (taking the q from qUnit) – to prevent confusion with the Java based GA utility.

Unfortunately, I never posted an update or let many people know. Sorry about that.

You can download qGoogleAnalytics here.

It includes a little University of Nottingham specific javascript, but is well commented so should be easily removed. I do hope to write an updated post about it and remove these bits. It’s reasonably well commented (in my opinion) as I generally compress all my JS using YUI Compressor.

In relation to the IE6 problem, I’ve not come across this. Sorry. We use it specifically in our intranet and our corporate browser is IE7.

First thanks for the great JS!

I’m searching in the web jQuery JS’s which track Google Analytics data.
I used for first testing the JS provided by Jason Huck. Over his blog I found your JS and your blog.

When I look at the date of this post and the comments, most seem to be from 2008 (except the ones from David). In the JS file you provide the revision is noted as:
@version 1.0 2008-06-18

Now my concrete question(s):
- Is this the most actual file you provide?
Because I’ve seen the suggestion for example by Harri Kauhanen and I was wondering if you still use the same/origin file for yourself?
I also read from your post ‘I’ve also updated the jQuery plugin since then and need to post about that too!’ which implies that you use a newer version?

- Did you ever have problems with wrong page counts with IE6?
Compared to the original JS call as Google provides, the IE6 page hits are around 50% less than with the jQuery JS. I think the most likely reason of this problem is the jQuery initialization.

Best regards and thnx for any info
Christian

We’ve taken a razor to nested-tables.xsl, so it would take a reasonable amount of work to duplicate.

I know that there was a talk at Sungard Summit 2009 in Philadelphia that did what I’d call a first step in Google Analytics and Luminis. They basically added the normal GA code to the just before the </body> tag in nested-tables.xsl and produced a series of lookups for the different tabs and URLs. This is OK if you’ve got a very limited number of roles, but is unreasonable with many roles.

Thnks

$.jGoogleAnalytics(
	'UA-XXXXXX-X',
	{
		pageViewsEnabled: false,
		submitEvents: {'#myForm': '/event/formSubmit'}
	}
);

…this would only track the submit event for that form. It would not track any page views.

Sorry – I guess I could have compressed it, but when we build our javascript, we compress many files into one, so it’s of no use to me